3. Issues surrounding the disputes over the KIKO
1) Unfair form Contract
2) Fraud; Unconscionable; Mistake
3) Fiduciary Duty
4) Investor Myopia
4. Ruling from Court
5. Sympathy, Confusion distort KIKO debate
Between 2006 and 2007, hundreds of export-oriented South Korean companies entered into what are called KIKO(Knock-in, Knock-out) target forward contracts to hedge against the threat of an appreciating Korean currency, the Won. Buyers of these contracts were assured a pre-determined foreign exchange rate as long as the range of exchange rate fluctuation stayed within a narrow band. In 2008, however, the Korean currency depreciated considerably following the global financial crisis, forcing buyers of the KIKO contracts to incur enormous losses. Why were there both supply and demand for these contracts, and why did they become suddenly popular? Psychological biases and cognitive limitations were perhaps at play, including herd behavior, investor myopia, information cascades, and optimism bias. Recognizing that these psychological factors could induce sub-optimal decisions of the contracting parties, we argue that de-biasing should be considered an important policy goal in financial contracting. While the scope of this paper is limited to the KIKO contracts, the principles used to examine this case can be broadly applied.