요즘 영어 교육에서 많이 이슈가 되고 있는
One theory와 Multiple theory에 관한 dabate입니다.
영어 수업 시간에 가장 많이 쓰기로 권유되는 APA 방식으로 작성 되었구요
전적으로는 multiple theory에 찬성하는 입장으로 쓴 글입니다
2. PREVIOUS RESEARCH IN THE STRUCTURE OF THEORY
3. INDIVIDUAL OPNION TO THE STRUCTURE OF THEORY
Second language learning is an immensely complex phenomenon. Millions of
human beings have experience of second language learning, and may have a good
practical understanding of the activities that helped them to learn. But this practical
experience, and the common-sense knowledge which it leads to, are clearly not enough
to help us understand fully how the process happens. As time goes by second language
learning is an important task to many people. Because of that reason many researchers
argue a theory that can make better second language learning. In this report, I will
examine some debates which related with a comprehensible general one theory and
Block, D. (1996). Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA. Applied Linguistics, 17, 1, 63-83.
Gregg, K. (1993). Taking explanation seriously; or, let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics, 14, 3, 276-294.
Long, M. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 649-666.
Mitchell, R. & Myles, M. (1998). Second language learning theories. Oxford University Press. 242.
Spolsky, B. (1988). Bridging the gap: A general theory of second language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 377-396.