검색어 입력폼

[스크린쿼터]스크린 쿼터

저작시기 1997.01 |등록일 2006.05.28 워드파일MS 워드 (doc) | 2페이지 | 가격 1,000원

소개글

스크린 쿼터 축소에 대한 찬성/반대 양측의 입장 (영문)

목차

1. 스크린쿼터 유지의 찬성/반대 진영의 의견을 간단히 정리, 비판

2. 스크린쿼터 유지의 찬성/반대 진영이 각각 지향하는 핵심가치
그 핵심가치가 왜 중요한지

3. 스크린쿼터와 FTA가 한국 전체에 미치는 영향 분석

4. 스크린쿼터 유지 여부에 대한 의견

본문내용

Because government announced policy that reduce Screen Quarter by half since July, argument is arising in several places. Screen Quarter system was made to protect South Korea motion picture industry, and theater must screen South Korea movie for schedule period among 1 year. But, problem happened reducing 73 day without any condition for FTA negotiation opening with the United States of America.

Approval and opposite point of view are colliding vigorously about Screen Quarter reduction.
First, people who is opposed to Screen Quarter reduction speak that Screen Quarter was fort of South Korea movie development. Actually, South Korea movie share been not more to 16% in 1993 roses gradually by 21% (1995), 23% (1996), 25% (1997) after Screen Quarter begins in 1993, and passed over 40% in 2001. Because of, cineastes forecast that readiness to invest may be decreased if Screen Quarter is reduced. Also, South Korea film production decreases and income movie is expected that is going to increase. But, insistence that only movie should be protected at time that market is opened in all fields is hard to understand.

On the contrary, these who agree in Screen Quarter reduction talk that South Korea movie had competitive power than Hollywood movie. `King`s man` and success comparison of joint work movie `King Kong` of United States of America•New Zealand are example. Opened late 2 weeks than `King Kong` that `King`s man` that 4500 million wons are invested is invested 200 billion wons but was boffo in public entertainment. These also insist that South Korea movie development is cineastes that improve competitive power of movie itself than Screen Quarter.

참고 자료

없음
다운로드 맨위로