II. What judges do
III. Factor that must equip to be desirable judges
1. A good knowledge of legal rules
2. Cool-headed judgment
3. The capacity to run trials
4. Confidence and courage
IV. The desirable roles of judges
The conscientious objection to military service is refusing obligatory military service such as enlistment, direct or indirect participation to war and armament conflict for conscientious reason, include belief or conscience the enemy historically without being limited in religious doctrine, and subject of refusal is various such as military services itself, specification system in army, particular weapon using, specification war denial. About this conscientious objection to military service, judgement of not-guilty was made for the first time. See that it is innocent that duty of military service refuses by religious belief in the country that is armistice. After judgment, it was conflicted situation of for or against the judgement, it was risen to a problem of social. People made to feel that it was rightful that take punishment if refuse conscientious objection to military service ago, but a judge who made this judgment need change of ideas socially now. Of course, it was become that punishment by conscientious objection to military service is reversed by final judgement of the Supreme Court and decision of the Constitutional court, but it can be made a social problem again.